Just another WordPress.com site

Day 8: Two Bills, One Scott

If you follow me on twitter (@beermonkey), you may have caught this tweet last night:

Was told today that the Governor’s office is aware of #HB660 and is asking questions. Our voice is being heard. Let’s keep it up!

It’s a good sign that our very young campaign for HB 660 is being noticed. Thanks again for all the letters, emails, phone calls and faxes you’ve been sending.

In addition to HB 660, there is another craft beer bill for consideration before the congress this year.  HB 602 (follow link for the text of the bill), filed by Jessica Farrar (D-Houston) is another go around for a bill filed in the past that would make it legal for microbreweries to offer cases of beer to tour-goers. 

 A few of you have asked for more information on HB 602 and how it compares and/or contrasts with HB 660.  Here is my take on it:

HB 660 would:

  • allow Texas brewpubs to sell to distributors and wholesalers
  • allow Texas brewpubs to sell up to 5,000 barrels per year at the pub, directly to consumers
  • allow Texas brewpubs to self-distribute their product to retailers so long as they are under 10,000 barrels per year
  • allow Texas brewpubs to have total production of up to 75,000 barrels per year
  • allow Texas microbreweries to change their license to a brewpub so long they meet the qualifications above

HB 602 would:

  • allow Texas breweries (excluding brewpubs, but including breweries like the A-B plant in Houston) to charge admission for a tour
  • allow Texas breweries to give tour participants up to 48 12-ounce bottles to take for off-premise consumption, without charge
  • not allow Texas breweries to sell beer to the ultimate consumer

Obviously, I support HB 660.  I also believe that the activities that would be permitted by HB 602 should be legal.  If a brewery wants to give you a couple of cases of beer, I believe they should be allowed to.  It should be noted, however, that HB 602 has a very narrow focus that affects only a handful of breweries: A-B in Houston, MillerCoors in Ft. Worth, Spoetzel in Shiner, St. Arnold in Houston, Real Ale in Blanco, Rahr in Ft. Worth, and Independence in Austin (in other words, only the breweries that package beer in 12-ounce bottles).

I support this bill and the efforts of the breweries who would be helped by its passage.  I would however, point to HB 660 as a more comprehensive piece of reform legislation that has a greater reach.  And with the exception of A-B, MillerCoors and Shiner who all exceed HB 660’s size restriction, the Brewpub bill allows the activities that HB 602 seeks to allow, should a brewery decide to change to a brewpub license.  A brewpub is legally allowed to sell you packaged product for off-premise consumption, so long as they have packaged product to sell (most don’t).

You will never find me campaigning against HB 602, as I think it’s a bill that should pass.  However, I believe our state is in need of greater reform that benefits our craft beer industry. 

Cheers,

Scott

Advertisements

7 responses

  1. Thanks for blogging about this….it’s already spreading over Facebook.

    January 18, 2011 at 1:35 pm

  2. Scott – I started reading (thanks to your Facebook Page) and didn’t stop until I had gone although the way back to the start.

    It’s no secret I’m a fan of your beer, food, and you as a person; but this blog sent me over the top. This defines what a small business should be. Your passion and love for what you do shines through in your posts and I am grateful to know you and your business.

    I think you’ve inspired me to write a post about this sort of passion and leadership amongst small local businesses. I’ll let you know what I come up with.

    In the meantime, keep me clued in, I’ll be spreading the word and would love to help see this become a reality.

    January 18, 2011 at 3:13 pm

  3. urbanspotlight

    I emailed Rep. Larson in support of the bill. Good luck.

    Debbie S.

    January 18, 2011 at 3:57 pm

  4. Doak

    I am excited about how quickly this snowball is growing. It has been a long time coming, but something might actually happen this year. I am very much encouraged by the amount of buzz this issue is getting so early in the session.

    Let’s keep it up, folks!

    January 18, 2011 at 4:29 pm

  5. Scott

    Why not get rid of the clause that limits the relationship between breweries and brewpubs?

    January 18, 2011 at 10:17 pm

  6. Cody

    After reading this bill and the existing brewpub license code, it seems like a production brewery (as long as it is brewing less than 75k barrels per year) would be better off licensing itself as a brewpub. This way it could sell onsite and off. It seems that there is no requirement for a brewpub to maintain any certain hours or to serve any food. Am I reading this right? If so, there is no reason for HB 602 except the 75k barrel limit.

    January 21, 2011 at 1:22 pm

  7. Pingback: HB 660 or HB 602 - BeerBent.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s